SOL Research
A look at the questions we are actively testing. Open any theory below to read it in full — the claim, the evidence, and what would settle it — exactly as members see it inside the app.
- ···
- Investigations
- ···
- Theories
- ···
- Citations
Active theories
A few of the claims we are testing right now. Each opens as a full, members-grade research page — no account needed to read it.
Five Traditions, One Inner Shift
Five isolated traditions describe one refusal-then-reception shift in consciousness
Kabbalah, John of the Cross, Boehme, Plotinus, and Chuang Tzu each describe a process in which actively refusing self-referential thought opens a different, receptive mode of awareness. New evidence suggests the same pattern appears in Christian mysticism more broadly: Paul's repeated phrase 'in Christ' and Julian of Norwich's idea that every soul is already 'oned' with God can both be read as saying that many selves share one common ground, and that the self-emptying step — 'not I, but Christ lives in me' — is what reveals it. Each tradition preserves a distinct facet of what may be one mechanism. The structural precision of the match is argued to exceed what independent cultural borrowing predicts, though at least some historical connections between these traditions are documented.
Jesus's Teachings and Inner Transformation
Jesus's core sayings describe an inner transformation
Jesus's most securely authentic sayings (the Beatitudes, reversal parables, "whoever would save their life will lose it," "unless you become as a child") can be read as descriptions of an inner self-releasing shift, not only as moral rules. This is a reading-mode claim that does not displace the doctrinal meaning, and it would be undercut if a Greco-Roman ethical control corpus read by the same method yielded the same structure.
Did Traditions Preserve Technical Knowledge?
Precision beyond what practice could yield signals inherited knowledge
When a tradition describes a process with more exactness than its practitioners could have reached through experience or reflection alone, that surplus precision is evidence the knowledge was inherited from an older source rather than invented. But a candidate case must clear a basic floor before the test even begins: the feature in question must actually be capable of doing what the technical claim says it does. Any candidate case must then be checked against ordinary observation, later systematizing by a teaching lineage, and coincidence before its precision counts as evidence.
Brain as Receiver of Awareness
Prediction may build the self while a witness sits behind it
Predictive processing and the receiver idea may not be rivals: prediction can be read as the machinery that builds the everyday narrative self (the ego), while the receiver idea says there is a separate 'witness' layer that self is presented to. They only clash if prediction insists the ego is all there is. But there is a deeper fork here. William James argued that trusting your own predictions and having a self are the same act — you cannot separate the forecasting mind from the one staking a claim on it. Patanjali's yoga tradition says the opposite: the whole point of contemplative practice is to watch the predicting mind from outside it, as an object, which means the witness and the forecaster can come apart. These two views make opposite predictions about what happens when someone deeply dissolves the self in practice — does forecasting stop too, or does it keep running while the witness simply steps back? The cleanest test remains an ego-dissolution state like strong DMT — vivid, stable experience with the self-model switched off — but practitioner reports from deep contemplative traditions could also help decide whether forecasting and self-staking always rise and fall together or can genuinely be separated.
Sound and Speech at Creation
Traditions chose sound because it alone needs source, medium, and wave
Several creation traditions reach for sound or speech rather than light or thought, and sound is the one everyday image that physically demands three things at once: a source that makes the disturbance, a medium that carries it, and a wave that travels through it. The hypothesis is that this triad, not mere poetry, explains the choice, since it matches the source-medium-wave structure cosmology now finds at the origin.
Kabbalah's Creation Account vs Modern Cosmology
An irreversible shattering would give creation a built-in arrow of time
This is the investigation's central question: whether the breaking of the vessels is a true point of no return whose repair moves forward into a genuinely new order rather than a reversible logical step. If the shevirah-then-tikkun transition is genuinely irreversible, the cosmogony has an intrinsic arrow of time that parallels thermodynamic irreversibility; if it is reversible in principle, the comparison reduces to a formal analogy.
Brain as Receiver of Awareness
The brain may receive awareness, not manufacture it
The mainstream view is that the brain produces consciousness the way a generator produces electricity; this investigation tests the rival idea that the brain works more like a receiver or filter that tunes and narrows an awareness it does not wholly create. The model only earns its place if it explains specific cases a generator brain struggles with and makes predictions that could prove it wrong.